“Who actually wins in my market, and where do I sit?”
A feed of open notices tells you what is being bought this week. It cannot tell you that one supplier has taken 594 of the last decade's contracts in your category, or that the buyer you have been chasing has bought from the same firm eleven times. That is in the awarded record, and it is a different question to search.
What you set
A market scope, once: country, the tags that describe your product line, an award window, and a value ceiling so a single national framework does not swamp the picture. The scope is remembered and every report inherits it.
What you get
Four aggregates over that scope — total awards, total awarded value, distinct supplier companies, distinct buyers — then a supplier leaderboard, buyer concentration, the record by year, and the return-to-market curve. Any bar, tile or row drills through to the awards behind it.
Where you appear
Name your own company and the page opens on your position rather than an anonymous ranking. If you sell through partners and never bid in your own name, it credits the awards your brand is named in to the partner that won them.
A run we made, in full
Canadian imaging equipment — ultrasound, x-ray, CT and MRI — awarded from 2014 onward, capped at CAD 500M so a national framework cannot distort the totals. Measured against the live API on 3 August 2026:
- Awards in scope
- 7,814
- Total awarded
- CAD 6.41bn
- Supplier companies
- 2,271
- Buying organisations
- 441
- 2,271 companies from 2,615 registration rows. The same firm registers under several entities and in both official languages. They are folded to one company before counting, so the leaderboard and the total cannot disagree.
- Return to market: 99 contracts in 2026, 64 in 2027, 71 in 2028, 69 in 2029. Published contract end dates first; projected ends are labelled as such.
- Drilling the leading supplier family returned 594 awards — the same figure as the bar that was clicked. Every mark on the page is a query you can open.
Scope, method and date shown because the corpus is retagged continuously: the same query an hour later returns a slightly larger total. We publish the run, not a rounded claim about it.
In the product on Enterprise,
at /awards/. Enterprise also includes the analyst work behind a market
like this one: tuning the classification to your product categories and mapping which
partners carry your line.